AIDS: Liberia Vice

During the last days VBS.TV has made a series of videos available created by them while traveling in Liberia (so far mainly Monrovia and surroundings) and talking to local journalists, war lords, slum inhabitants and other “normal people“. A story about civil war, drugs, AIDS, child soldiers, rape, daily killing, corruption, cannibalism… – it shows how deep the rabbit hole goes in one of the poorest countries and failed states on this planet.

The series comprises 8 short videos with different stations of their “travel” through Liberia of which so far 4 are online on their site.


Click on the image below for the link

link to VBS.TV web site


What they have so far not covered is how much foreign aid is sunk into this country and what actually happens with it.

There are almost a dozen U.N. and other international agencies plus private aid organizations present or working with that country / the government of. Hundreds of million USD have been flooded into Liberia after the official end of the civil war 2003 and more monies are allotted in even larger grants for the future. There are about 19,000 U.N. peace keepers currently present (cost not included in the above sum) to separate the various fighting parties.

First it’s good to know that international aid agencies love small countries like Liberia (ca. 3.5 million population) or Rwanda as with relatively small amounts, in general, large results can be created in a short period of time – at least on paper. This often works along the lines of percentage of people in need reached with their programs and most of the times does not calculate in longer term, systemic issues or actual change of the situation for those in need.

Let’s have a closer look at a smaller grant provided to Liberia in the last years to fight AIDS. It is published as a success, but we refrain from naming the organization(s) involved as it is like quite a few of their grants – actually almost all grants of that international organization providing the funds that have so far been reviewed – another example for misconduct and abuse of funds. We did use numbers provided by that organization, very conservative estimates for some actual numbers not directly available – this is a real world example:

They have provided almost USD 8 million via another international agency to the local government over a period of about 2.5 years. This is one of the smaller grants – but as said before – considered a success. While there is no real budget information available – one of the reasons some say most of their grants are actually institutionalized corruption – let’s have a bit of a deeper look into what happened with that money based on the sparse information made available.

While claiming that in the last half year they would have treated about 900 AIDS patients besides handing out brochures and providing general training to a few hundreds they also say they’ve handed out about 2 condoms to around 2.6 Million people each which for Liberia must be above the number of people living in that country within the population bracket potentially affected (e.g. above 14 to 50 years). At the same time a whole plethora of other international agencies are claiming similar numbers during the same period with even more money out of their own budgets put onto it.

Nevertheless, lets just assume for a moment there would be no double-, triple-, quadruple-counting of interventions and say those numbers are close to reality which we have our strongest doubts. Now we will break down these numbers on realistic cost bases as published by the international community (which factors in their cost of distribution as well – i.e. the cost of running the international agencies with regards to these tasks).


1. ARV treatment

Cost for ARV treatment have come down massively from initial prohibitive levels of > USD 10,000 p.a. / patient in the early 1990s to now around USD 1,000 – 2,000 in Africa (including USD 300-500 for the cost of drugs). We do believe that those figures are artificially high for the countries in concern here – they should be a maximum of around 2 times the drug cost which would make it 600 – 1000 USD – effective use of generics would further lower this but lets stick with the numbers provided by international agencies.


2. Condom distribution

Generally agreed condom distribution costs for areas / situations similar to Liberia are about 10 cents per condom. Cost of the condom within that is about 3 cents. We stick with these numbers as well.


3. General training, brochures etc.

As a 3rd part of that grant various other “interventions” are listed including general awareness training, information etc that the grant organization says have been provided to various groups of people within Liberia. We estimate a “very generous” USD 1 million flat for that (most likely it will be much less).

Estimates based on these numbers sum up to:

  • ca. 750 treated for 2.5 years ca. USD 2.8 million (detail numbers top end last 1/2 year ca. 900 people)
  • ca. 5.4 Million condoms distributed (USD 0.1 distribution cost) USD 540,000
  • other treatments, training and information distribution (flat) USD 1 Million
  • total (high estimate) ca. USD 4.3 Million


Now just remember we are talking about a country where almost 80% of the population is living on USD 1 per day (50% on less than 50 cents a day). And we have assumed that all of the goods & services provided have actually been purchase out of these funds and that none of the condoms, drugs or services from other programs or donations were used to be counted here again (which to our knowledge has happened quite a few times in the past in various countries). And we have – as said before – already factored in the cost for the international agencies providing the distribution and other services.

So what has happened to the remaining almost 50% of the grant money – well it has disappeared. That effect is called corruption, abuse of funds, gross misconduct or other euphemisms. And this grant is considered a success. If one adapts this example with real life experience and estimates provided public / non-public in our example with “counting mistakes etc” we would most likely end up at around 70-80% that has disappeared from the funds that once had arrived in country. But that would be guessing – or wouldn’t it.

One could expect to see some hard facts or real budget figures on what actually happened with that money as in our example it is almost all tax payers funds. But this is what those kind of “humanitarian organizations” are fighting to the blood not to have – there is no accountability – its just like a bottomless pit with lots of people profiteering along the lines the monies travel.

And as the “cream on top of this” that agency in Geneva – for basically having some people writing some checks and filling out half a dozen MS Excel sheets with very little data – is charging a fee of almost USD 1 Million to do that (again: They don’t implement they only provide the money – actually not theirs, your money). Yes this is not the money for distributing or helping in-country – this million is basically just for writing the checks.

How far can you stretch this?

Seemingly even further as we used the fee structure from a few years ago. On today’s fees that would add up to more than USD 2 Million for writing the checks. That’s 50% disappearing in country, another 25% on top for general administration / writing checks and all that above the USD 100,000+ salaries (after taxes) for the “humanitarian workers” from international agencies that have already been included in the distribution costs.

No surprise people are getting more-and-more angry about these bloated structures.

But the worst of it all with programs like the above grant – nothing really changes. And when the U.N. will move out from Liberia next year as planned it all starts over again. Your taxes at work to change the world.

Now we guess you got a bit of background information to evaluate where this kind of “Aid” will get the people in Liberia. Now watch those videos and understand one of the key principles of such type of “Aid” – only when the conflict continues, only when misery perpetuate there will be an endless steam of money for the parasites along the lines. And sometimes some breadcrumbs fall down to the people in-country needing that help to survive – if that would change anything – those people don’t care. But such “unlikely” situations are always great photo-opportunities and stories to tell to even get more money.


(Update/Note: The organization used within this example is not an U.N. organization while some have already assumed that by their office location. It is nevertheless almost completely funded by tax monies. It should be noted that there are other initiatives including tax payer funded ones that are actually trying to change the situation of the people in Liberia by fighting poverty, building sanitarian facilities and strengthening the health system often with far less monies at hand but real results to look back to.)

Related Posts:


  1. AIDS: Some less known facts on the disease (1)
  2. link to article
    Following below the first part of facts and thoughts on AIDS that most people don’t know…

    Continue reading…


  3. World AIDS Day: Speeches, Speeches, Speeches
  4. link to article
    Like at every “World AIDS Day” before it is also the day of speeches and memorandums. And clapping each other’s back to tell how great work we all do. The same has happened for more than 30 years within the “fight” against Malaria and Tuberculosis and – let’s face it – there is lots of room for improvement and more efficiency. Maybe people should just start getting the job done and…

    Continue reading…


  5. AIDS: Costly Red Campaign Reaps Meager $18 Million
  6. link to article
    There is an interesting article in “Advertising Age” – one of the leading publications of the industry – about the RED campaign by Bono and a group of companies. We suggest to also read the comments on the article. There are a few interesting ones beside the normal “wood” and “heroic praises”. “…The disproportionate ratio between the marketing outlay and the money raised is drawing concern among nonprofit watchdogs, cause-marketing experts and even executives in the ad business. It threatens to spur a backlash, not just against the Red campaign — which ambitiously set out to change the cause-marketing model by allowing partners to profit from charity — but also for the brands involved…”

    Continue reading…


  7. AIDS: Costly Red Campaign (2)
  8. link to article
    Find below a link to the CNN video report on the issues with the so called RED campaign “reported yesterday” by the leading advertising industry magazine “Advertising Age”. We are looking forward and expecting that soon someone will also shed light on what actually happens with the USD 18 Mln. that made it to the “Global Fund” – expect some hot stories here. To get a first glimpse on that read a report at the “Boston Globe” (there are a few others there one also pointing to the fraud investigations within that organization). This nevertheless is just the tip of the iceberg as we hear from insiders…

    Continue reading…

Comments Off

Comments are closed.